US Open organisers look at Monday final

After four consecutive years of rain-postponed men’s finals, the US Open is looking into changing its schedule as soon as next year and could become the first Grand Slam tennis tournament to switch permanently to a Monday finish.

Tournament director Jim Curley has revealed that the US Tennis Association (USTA) started discussions last month with broadcaster CBS about finding a way to heed top players’ calls for a day off between the men’s semif-inals and final. Currently, the US Open is the only major tournament that schedules those matches on consecutive days, Saturday and Sunday.

Roger Federer, whose record 16 Grand Slam titles include five at the US Open, was among those who said during this year’s tournament that it’s time to rethink the schedule. He has called word of possible changes “the right move for our sport”.

One proposal under consideration would add a 15th day to the tournament, shifting the men’s final from Sunday to Monday, and the women’s final from Saturday night to Sunday afternoon. That also would give the women a day to rest between their semi-finals and final.

The USTA is also considering keeping the men’s title match in its traditional Sunday afternoon spot, but moving their semi-finals to Friday. The USTA board of directors has approved exploring various scheduling options. “We’re just getting into this process,” Curley said, “and right now, everything is on the table.”

The US Open, played at Flushing Meadows in New York, has boasted what it calls “Super Saturday” since 1984, with two men’s semi-finals and the women’s final all played on that day, followed by the men’s final on Sunday. Wimbledon, the French Open and Australian Open follow another pattern: women’s semi-finals on Thursday, men’s semi-finals on Friday, women’s final on Saturday, men’s final on Sunday.

“The sport has become much more physical over the years, to the point where players feel very strongly that they need to have a day between the semis and the final,” Curley said. “While the players are an integral part of the US Open, it’s one aspect we need to take into consideration, along with onsite fans, TV viewers, corporate sponsors, television partners, both domestic and international. It’s a Rubik’s Cube, since so many variables need to be taken into consideration.”

Changes might result in the loss of one or two sessions during the US Open and a change in TV rights fees received by the USTA. “It’s fair to say that this type of change would have a negative financial impact on the USTA, and that’s another reason why we’re being very thoughtful in this process. We’re talking about millions of dollars,” Curley said.

He acknowledged such losses “would have to have an impact” on any future plans to add a roof to the tournament facility.